Kotaku Doesn’t Read The Articles They Link

Posted Thursday, June 15th, 2006 at 9:31 pm by MJG

You're a wizard, Florian. A wizard of READING COMPREHENSION.Kotaku’s Harry Potter-fanfic-character-name-havin’ Florian Eckhardt has not the time for reading interviews, not when he has to battle the ten-headed quotabeast while all hopped up on postyjuice potion. He’ll just have to skim and decide what the interview says.

But I sort of skimmed the interview myself, so I’m not too sure if there really is a part where, as Fancy Florian points out, Randy says he was fired for pushing too hard to keep Thief 3 more like the first two. I’ll have to assume that it’s after the part where he says that’s absolutely not the reason he was fired, and having no idea where that rumor came from.

Not to say it didn’t happen. You can change your mind mid-interview. He just would have had to go back on that part, and the part before it where he said the idea to make the gameplay “support sophisticated interaction, planning, thinking, and slow pace, in addition to supporting more traditional action-y stuff” was a goal “that I agreed with and helped drive.”

I’m also looking for the part where Hufflepuff’s Flying Broom Wrangler Florian says Randy “bluntly points out that Deus Ex: Invisible War sucked.” Maybe I just can’t read between the lines here: “I actually have a lot of respect for the product they made. I played an early version and really enjoyed it - more than DX1, I’d say.”

I don’t think he can be sued for libel, mostly because our non-wizard laws don’t apply to him, but also it’s hard to libel someone when you link to the interview so people can read for themselves that it says pretty much the exact opposite of what you say it does. But I am not a lawyer.

Read - Why Thief 3 Sucked: Interview With Randy Smith [Kotaku via #1 Tipster Andrew]

2 Responses to “Kotaku Doesn’t Read The Articles They Link”

  1. Dave Long Says:

    Given the original article came from Evil Avatar, it’s easy to see the interview was done with an agenda that doesn’t coincide with the actual answers. Not only Kotaku picked up on this one, but it’s on Slashdot with a similar post title and actually credits Kotaku with finding it.

    That whole concept of crediting someone else for finding an interview on another site is about as asinine as it gets.

  2. Charles Says:

    The only way I can see that Kotaku misunderstood the article would be by not paying attention to who was talking. I mean, some of what the interviewer said could’ve been interpreted as he saw it. But I suspect (and correct me if you feel I’m wrong) that Jonathan and Randy are two separate and distinct people.

ADVERTISEMENT