<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Metafuture &#187; Rockstar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metafuture.com/category/rockstar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metafuture.com</link>
	<description>Forthright gaming news and culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Duke Dork-Up Has Legs</title>
		<link>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/14/duke-dork-up-has-legs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/14/duke-dork-up-has-legs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D Realms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogbudsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Nukem Forever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockstar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/14/duke-dork-up-has-legs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now 1UP is in on the action.
Though 3D Realms has now got to take some of the blame for this continuing, because George &#8220;The Decider&#8221; Broussard himself can&#8217;t even be bothered to know for sure what the deal is. Or maybe he really does, and the plan is to let this story ride until even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.metafuture.com/media/2006/06/eugduke.jpg" alt="Knock some sense into him, Sandman." title="Knock some sense into him, Sandman." />Now <a href="http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3151484" target="_blank">1UP is in on the action.</a></p>
<p>Though 3D Realms has now got to take some of the blame for this continuing, because <a href="http://forums.3drealms.com/vb/showpost.php?p=318904&#038;postcount=14" target="_blank">George &#8220;The Decider&#8221; Broussard himself can&#8217;t even be bothered to know for sure what the deal is</a>. Or maybe he really does, and the plan is to let this story ride until even Take-Two starts thinking that they owe 3D Realms $4.25 million when <em>Duke</em> ships. Naw, that&#8217;s too clever, or at least too not-cribbed-from-a-Bruce-Campbell-or-other-iconic-gamer-movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/14/duke-dork-up-has-legs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GameSpot, Joystiq Correct Half Of Duke Nukem Story</title>
		<link>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/12/gamespot-joystiq-correct-half-of-duke-nukem-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/12/gamespot-joystiq-correct-half-of-duke-nukem-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D Realms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogbudsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Nukem Forever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockstar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/12/gamespot-joystiq-correct-half-of-duke-nukem-story/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GameSpot digs deeper:
[Editor's note: GameSpot originally misreported the figure 3D Realms would be paid upon completion of Duke Nukem Forever. It has since been corrected. We regret the error.]
Keep regretting, fellas, because the amount 3D Realms is getting paid is zero.
It&#8217;s the new Highlander Style Fact-Checking Method: when you are notified of an inaccuracy in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GameSpot <a href="http://www.gamespot.com/news/6152594.html" target="_blank">digs deeper</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[Editor's note: GameSpot originally misreported the figure 3D Realms would be paid upon completion of Duke Nukem Forever. It has since been corrected. We regret the error.]</p></blockquote>
<p>Keep regretting, fellas, because the amount 3D Realms is getting paid is zero.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the new Highlander Style Fact-Checking Method: when you are notified of an inaccuracy in an article, stop as soon as you find and correct it, as there can be only one.</p>
<p>Joystiq has also fixed the erroneous $4,250 dollar figure, and also still have that money as going to 3D Realms. Can these almost assiduous all-stars pull off another screw-up or will they get it right the next time? And what about sites like Next Generation that haven&#8217;t made any corrections yet? Will they just crib from GameSpot again and stay wrong, like Ponyboy stays gold? Did Robert Frost ever write a poem about being wrong that makes fictional greasers a little gay for each other?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/06/10/500-000-offered-to-finish-duke-nukem-forever-this-year/" target="_blank">Joystiq&#8217;s update, with ironic jab at GameSpot&#8217;s acumen *UPDATE 6/13* &#8230;is now completely fixed (I think, it&#8217;s 90% unreadable now)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/12/gamespot-joystiq-correct-half-of-duke-nukem-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inaccurate Reading Of SEC Filing Parroted By All Blogs Except This One</title>
		<link>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/10/inaccurate-reading-of-sec-filing-parroted-by-all-blogs-except-this-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/10/inaccurate-reading-of-sec-filing-parroted-by-all-blogs-except-this-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D Realms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogbudsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke Nukem Forever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockstar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/10/inaccurate-reading-of-sec-filing-parroted-by-all-blogs-except-this-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s so hard to say who first reported the news that 3D Realms was only going to get $4,250 for the publishing of Duke Nukem Forever due to a renegotiation of their contract with Take-Two. But that mistake is everywhere now.
The new deal was referenced as being reported in Take-Two&#8217;s most recent SEC filing. SEC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.metafuture.com/media/2006/06/eugduke.jpg" alt="It's me again!" title="It's me again!" />It&#8217;s so hard to say who first reported the news that 3D Realms was only going to get $4,250 for the publishing of <em>Duke Nukem Forever</em> due to a renegotiation of their contract with Take-Two. But that mistake is everywhere now.</p>
<p>The new deal was referenced as being reported in Take-Two&#8217;s most recent SEC filing. SEC filings always report figures in thousands of dollars. So Take-Two actually brought the payout down from $6 million to $4.25 million, stupids. It takes very little time to get <a href="http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?dcn=0001125282-06-003343&#038;Type=HTML" target="_blank">the SEC filing</a> off of Yahoo, and then CTRL-F to search for &#8220;Duke&#8221;. Less than a minute. Then you would have had a chance to see you were being dumb.</p>
<p>What you couldn&#8217;t have known from reading that, though, is that a) <a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=8878" target="_blank">this is two month-old news</a>, or <a href="http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?dcn=0001125282-06-000471&#038;Type=HTML" target="_blank">five months</a> if you were good at connecting <a href="http://www.3drealms.com/dnf-onegametorulethemall/index.php/DNF_Publisher" target="_blank">old dots</a>, and b) the payment isn&#8217;t going to 3D Realms, but rather <em>has already gone</em> to <em>DNF</em>&#8217;s original publisher, GT Interactive, now part of Atari. If you&#8217;ll recall GT also had gotten $6 million when they signed over the publishing rights to Take-Two in the first place, too, aka the smartest deal GT Interactive ever made. The truth is, 3D Realms is going to get nothing from Take-Two for shipping except a a royalty check or two before the game is laughed off of shelves.</p>
<p>You guys did nail the part about the $500,000 bonus if it ships before the end of the year, though! Except it also goes to Atari. Great blogging!</p>
<p>Quite a list of blogtardedness involved here:</p>
<p><span id="more-73"></span><a href="http://www.gamespot.com/news/2006/06/09/news_6152594.html" target="_blank">GameSpot</a>, probably Patient Zero, who passed it on to</p>
<p><a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/06/10/500-000-offered-to-finish-duke-nukem-forever-this-year/" target="_blank">Joystiq</a>, whereupon</p>
<p><a href="http://www.destructoid.com/500000-offered-to-finish-duke-nukem-forever-this-year" target="_blank">Destructoid</a> got it, and got a typo mutation that left Take-Two offering <em>themselves</em> the $4,250.</p>
<p><a href="http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/10/0832241&#038;from=rss" target="_blank">Slashdot</a> and <a href="http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/712/712055p1.html" target="_blank">Voodoo Extreme</a> got caught by GameSpot, too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13698&#038;" target="_blank">Evil Avatar</a> didn&#8217;t repeat or dispute the number but did have the money as going to 3D Realms.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/take-two/will-duke-nukem-forever-really-ship-in-06-179838.php" target="_blank">Kotaku</a> actually got the $4.25 million right but also said it would be going to 3D Realms.</p>
<p>As did <a href="http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=3191&#038;Itemid=2" target="_blank">Next Generation</a>.</p>
<p>Again, &#8220;good job&#8221; to all of you, for getting stale news almost completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/10/inaccurate-reading-of-sec-filing-parroted-by-all-blogs-except-this-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take-Two&#8217;s Stock Got The Incompetent Management Blues</title>
		<link>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/09/take-twos-stock-got-the-incompetent-management-blues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/09/take-twos-stock-got-the-incompetent-management-blues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rockstar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/09/take-twos-stock-got-the-incompetent-management-blues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does the company that outright owns Grand Theft Auto (and published recent hits Civilization IV and Oblivion) lose over half its market value in the space of a year? Take-Two was valued at a 52-week high price of $29.60 per share&#8212; 51 weeks ago. With trading down $2.50 a share today, the current price [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.metafuture.com/media/2006/06/johnleehooker.jpg" alt="John Lee Hooker" title="John Lee Hooker" />How does the company that outright owns <em>Grand Theft Auto</em> (and published recent hits <em>Civilization IV</em> and <em>Oblivion</em>) lose over half its market value in the space of a year? Take-Two was valued at a 52-week high price of $29.60 per share&mdash; 51 weeks ago. With trading down $2.50 a share today, the current price is in the mid 14&#8217;s. Historically, that&#8217;s a net gain of about zero since <em>Grand Theft Auto III</em> became a hit almost five years ago.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s getting paid the millions of CEO dollars to piss away all that revenue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/09/take-twos-stock-got-the-incompetent-management-blues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rockstar Cancels A Game</title>
		<link>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/08/rockstar-cancels-a-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/08/rockstar-cancels-a-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 18:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogbudsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rockstar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/08/rockstar-cancels-a-game/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the news. The news wasn&#8217;t that it was Snow, because nobody cared about Snow&#8212; in fact, that&#8217;s probably the first time you ever heard about it. Even the completist GameSpot couldn&#8217;t care less: it has just two pieces of information about it: its showing at E3 2005 and the cancellation&#8212; and the former was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.metafuture.com/media/2006/06/billy_ock.gif" alt="It was just a loser of a game, you schmucks." title="It was just a loser of a game, you schmucks." />That&#8217;s the news. The news wasn&#8217;t that it was <em>Snow</em>, because nobody cared about <em>Snow</em>&mdash; in fact, that&#8217;s probably the first time you ever heard about it. Even the completist GameSpot couldn&#8217;t care less: it has just two pieces of information about it: its showing at E3 2005 and the cancellation&mdash; and the former was so buzz-unworthy they used Bethany Massimilla to cover it.</p>
<p>Why the lack of interest? Because it was a cel-shaded tycoon game about running drugs with card-based battle sequences. Sure, that may <em>sound</em> interesting&mdash; until I tell you that this was not the idea of a lovably crazy Japanese man, but rather a company whose previous release was an expansion pack for <em>Tropico 2</em>. It&#8217;s quite probable that a random number generator figured heavily into the design phase, and in fact <em>Snow</em> was the one picked over the other finalist, a first-person survival horror game about running drugs, with battles resolved via horse racing.</p>
<p>Of course a plausible reason for the game&#8217;s cancellation, therefore, was obviously&#8230;<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/06/commentary/game_over/column_gaming/?cnn=yes" target="_blank">that Rockstar felt the game was going to be too controversial</a>. So instead of making it run-of-the-mill controversial&mdash; like their recently shipped PS2 port of the decapitated-with-spurting-neck simulator <em>Liberty City Stories</em>&mdash; and raking in cash, they decided to scrap what was surely a profitable game to avoid their public image taking a beating beyond their current comfort level of &#8220;embodiment of the culturally mephitic evil of the game industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a more plausible conjecture derived from the events: Rockstar cancels <em>Snow</em>. Snow cancels school. Therefore, Rockstar wants there to be more school, and <em>Bully</em> is currently being re-worked as an edutainment title to be provided free as a public service. Post that, <a href="http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/take-two/take-two-now-pta-friendly-179164.php" target="_blank">Kotaku</a>, <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2006/06/06/2k-games-kicks-its-habit-drops-snow/" target="_blank">Joystiq</a>, <a href="http://www.destructoid.com/take-2-takes-two-then-leaves-cancels-game-snow" target="_blank">Destructoid</a>, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.metafuture.com/2006/06/08/rockstar-cancels-a-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
